Testimony of former member's experiences in the
Word of Faith Fellowship Church - Spindale, NC. Individual and company
names have been removed or changed to protect privacy; only exception
is the name of the group's leader, Jane Whaley
My time at Word could best be described as lonely.
Friendships were not allowed to become close, because you were afraid
to share your heart. We were taught that if you really loved someone,
then you would expose their sins to leadership. That meant that
anything you said , could and probably would get into the ears of
the main leadership. So you kept to yourself; at least I did. This
concept of telling leadership everything was a doctrine. We were
taught to tell about everything we did, even to the most intimate
areas of our lives. Nothing was personal there. We were expected
to expose sin in those we loved the most. That included my husband,
my sister, my mother, my children. We did these things as unto the
Lord. You were taught that to tell on someone was showing them the
love of God. It was also a wonderful way to advance yourself in
Jane Whaley's kingdom. If leadership perceived that you would come
to them, they would reward you for telling on people. It would be
said that you were getting a breakthrough. Ten years, and no close
friendships were formed.
Raising children in the Word of Faith was tough. I
was expected to be with them at all times, to listen to their conversations,
as they might give to harlotry in their talk. My spirituality was
tied into whether I could control them. We were told that we had
to put big underclothes on the children when they turned two, even
if they were not potty-trained. It was thought that if your children
were not trained by the age of 2, then there was something wrong
with your walk with God. If you were right with God, then your children
would get their breakthrough, and be potty trained. It was said
that failure to use the potty was rebellion. Just as individuality
was discouraged for the adults, so it was also for the children.
The children were scolded for laughing and having a good time; they
were being foolish if they laughed. My son wanted to play with his
friend at our house, but was never allowed to because they (the
friend's family) never got a breakthrough in God. What exactly did
that mean? Well, when they were together they laughed, played, and
loved each other; this of course was a sin. The church's leadership
was threatened by any close relationship at any age. They would
say it was perversion. Children were not allowed to be alone at
all. They were kept under the supervision of an adult at all times;
this included older children and young adults. They were not allowed
to even go to bathroom alone, even in their teenage years. Teenagers
were not allowed to answer the phone or use it without the presence
of an adult. There were a million rules, even about the way children
played, for instance no car noises, no imaginary friends, no pretending
at all. They could not even play with real tools; they might be
dangerous. Jane was big on promoting fear at every level to every
member. Their every move was controlled and monitored. They were
taught to expose everything to leadership. They were taught that
they should tell on their parents for any wrongdoing. They would
be told that they did not love God or their parents if they didn't
tell all.
There were many rules about marriage as well as everything
else. They taught again that if you loved your mate, then you would
expose their sins to leadership. The thought behind it was that
you could get them help with their shortcomings. Closeness was discouraged
by this rule. If a mate really believed this, then you would be
afraid to talk to that mate, because they might go to leadership.
Jane, over a period of several years, began to interfere with the
marriage bed. She taught first that the love of God was the same
for everybody, that you would feel no different towards your mate
than you did towards her, or anyone. If you had feelings for your
mate, then that was perversion. If you wanted to spend time with
them then you were perverse. After all, it was the will of God for
them to be on the work schedule. After this teaching, they went
into the marriage bed. They taught that you were only to have sex
with your partner 2 to 3 times a month, that you should wear a condom
even if you could not get pregnant; this would bring restraints
to the act itself and keep it from being "unclean". They
said it was a sin to bring lust into the marriage bed, which was
defined as being together more than 2 to 3 times a month. They also
taught that you were to go to someone in authority over you if you
wanted to be intimate with your mate. The idea was that they could
help you discern if it was God's will, or if you were being driven
by lust. They also encouraged the men to let Jane Whaley's son-in-law
buy the condoms for the couples. The idea here was that they could
make sure that couples were not together more often than was taught.
They divided the married couples into groups according to age. Incidentally,
Jane taught the group of middle aged men herself. She encouraged
them to have meetings with her and other members of the leadership
to tell them their shortcomings related to this area. One other
scripture that they used was that "to the pure in heart, all
things are pure." They have since denied teaching this, because
it ended up in the local paper. They did teach it; I heard it with
my own ears.
I am convinced that the reason behind the marriage
doctrine was to keep people from complaining about the work schedule.
At one point, I went to Jane's daughter and asked about the 2 to
3 x a month doctrine. She told me that it was because of our schedules;
since we were, in effect, too busy to give our whole hearts, so
that we should be able to give our whole hearts when we were with
our mates. I now believe that the whole thing was centered around
the work schedule, and Whaley's desire to keep the men on it. If
being with your mate was a sin, then the work schedule was God's
way to keep you out of sin. The work schedule was originally created
to remodel the homes of members. Jane perceived that breakthroughs
were coming as a result of working together. People literally were
and still do work from morning till bedtime. We wanted to get our
house painted, so we were put on a list. Although my husband went
out on the work schedule every night and sometimes on Saturdays,
we were on the list for 2 1/2 years and never did get our house
painted. Paying jobs and work for Jane's many aunts, uncles, and
cousins took precedence. So although we were working on the schedule
every night, we couldn't get our house painted. While on the work
schedule, my husband pulled a muscle, and we would see, plainer
than ever, the true heart of the ministry.
My husband went out and worked on Jane's cousin's
house, and pulled a muscle while there. At our employer's urging
, we went to the hospital. After this, we were trying to decide
how to pay the bill. We did not have any benefits at the church
company that we worked for. Church leaders came to us and basically
said that we could pay the bill by borrowing money against our house,
or we could sell our trac loader. They said that we could consolidate
our bills and that would be helpful to our deteriorating financial
condition. We did not earn good money at the church, so it was difficult
to pay our bills. I prayed, and believed God showed me that we could
go back against the homeowner's insurance. This action would not
and did not have any adverse effects against the homeowner's insurance.
I went back to them and told them this; they did not want to do
that; they said that it would attack Jane's cousin. Jane's cousin
earns a lot of money, and tithes. She also has influence and knows
many important people in law enforcement. So, even though they knew
that our financial situation was very bad, that I stayed home, and
though we only earned around 23k per year, they wanted us to pay
the bill. We could not and I went back to them, so they told me
that they would put it against the church's insurance. They told
us that they would handle everything; in fact, one of the church
leaders informed me that it had been put against the church's insurance.
However, the person at the hospital told me that the company that
Ray had given would not pay; she filed it against a company that
she knew would pay. Then that company said that they would not pay
until the homeowners paid their share. At this point, we were making
payments and were just letting it ride. We hated to file it against
the homeowner. The hospital stepped in and told us that we had to
come up with the money. We then went back to the church leader,
who assured us that he would go to Jane's cousin. He later said
that he had gone to her, and that her insurance would pay . We were
told that it had been filed and that everything was taken care of.
I was talking to Jane's cousin's mother and realized that this church
leader was listening; I immediately knew that something was wrong.
I called around and found out where her insurance was the next day.
Our claim had never been filed as this leader had told us. I confronted
them, and it was filed that next day. I had to make them do what
was right.
This was not the first incident on the work schedule.
The first time that anything had ever happened on the work schedule
was when XYZ Construction was working on the Green River Project
in Boiling Springs, NC. My husband had worked around 90 hours the
week before, and got paid only for 44 hours. We were asked to donate
the rest to build a new school for the children. (Although you were
"asked", it was expected.) My husband contracted trench
mouth the following week, which is a condition caused by a lack
of rest and poor nutrition, in other words a direct result of the
schedule the week before. Although we had worked all those hours
the week before, we were not compensated in any way for the time
lost. We had to put our groceries on our credit card, and had to
pay the doctor bills. Right after this, XYZ Construction donated
15,000 to the new building. We were beginning to get the Word of
Faith picture. This was the very first job, that XYZ got paid for,
that the labor of the men was donated to the Word of Faith. This
practice started out innocently enough, but after the building was
built for the school, men were still expected to donate free labor
for jobs that both church companies, XYZ Construction and ABC Company,
got paid on. Thus, the hidden money agenda was no longer so hidden,
at least not to us.
I still vividly remember an incident that exposes
the heart of the ministry so plainly. There had been media exposure,
and someone in the community had driven by the church yard sale
and shot into the house where it was held. Despite this, church
leaders never missed a day of the yard sale. They asked for volunteers
to sit out at the sale. They told people that they would have to
have hold of God if they went out. The person who was responsible
for the shooting was not in custody at this time.
Businesses were not allowed to start unless Jane approved
of them. She not only had to approve of them, but in actuality she
had to run them as well. We got an old tractor and truck. John thought
that we should buy a new tractor to be good witnesses for the Lord.
After all, God would not have an old tractor. I never felt like
that was right. We were forced by Jane Whaley to run our tractor
through XYZ Construction. We never felt comfortable with this situation.
I went to Jane and to another leader numerous times to try to get
around this , but never could. As time passed, we began to realize
that John was getting his own equipment. When I approached him about
it, he lied and said that he did not know where God was taking him,
but that at that time he was not going into heavy equipment. I told
him that if he did that, we would be making other employment plans.
I believe that he thought that Jane could make us go with him. She
did try. John did indeed buy heavy equipment. The way he played
it out was that he needed some work done at his house. He had my
husband bring our tractor to his house. When my husband was moving
the tractor, Jenny came over to help me watch the children. Many
times I went to leadership, because that my husband was gone so
much he could not mow our yard. We never had any help except a high
school girl who was forced to come. Since she did not want to be
there, it was a deal to get her to help. But on the day that we
moved our tractor to Jenny's house, she came to help. Since she
was there, we could not discuss the situation. My husband never
felt like it was right to take the tractor over there. John bought
his own tractor 4 days after we did the work at his house. He had
asked us to do it for a blessing. He would pay for the fuel. We
did. My husband quit working for John on the Wednesday that he told
him he was going to buy equipment. John had never owned heavy equipment.
He had only had experience on a rubber tire tractor, with a backhoe
attachment. He needed my husband to stay. After this, John came
back around and told us how much he loved us, and that if we ever
needed him, he would be there. John knew that my husband had run
his tractor for 7 hours, and that we were not working. In spite
of this he tried to pay him for 3 of the 7 hours. I flipped out
and called Jane, who made him pay us for the rest of the time. We
were getting the message about Word of Faith.
After my husband left, a former member tells how that
he and another member went in front of John's to watch for the DMV,
as John did not have the proper license to run his own truck. When
the former member went to Jane, she told him God's laws were above
man's laws and that if he understood God's laws, he would have understood
why it was the will of God for John to break the law.
It was most difficult to leave John's company, because
we were emotionally involved. It was more difficult than leaving
the church. We were treated very badly when we left his company.
John was an idol of the people. I remember that I had my small children
in my arms, and was going for the door, when Carrie (John's niece
by marriage) walked out the door looked straight at me and then
let the door go right in my face. My arms were full. I had my baby
and my toddler in my arms. That was how it was, people perceived
that we had done something wrong. It was reinforced by Jane. First
she put us on church discipline for leaving and then she announced
that it was God's will for another member to go to work somewhere
else. No such announcement was ever made for us. The timing was
deliberate on Jane's part to brainwash the people, and it worked!
People who had known us for years stopped speaking to us. It was
a very hard time in our lives.
We left, actually my husband left first in February
of 1999, then I left in April of the same year. I would like to
say that we have been allowed to go on with our lives, but we have
not. The church has had members ride up and down in front of our
house daily. They have also gone on a private road beside our house
and looked into our sliding glass doors. One member who did this
followed my husband at work for several days. Recently another member
tried to run my husband off the road. This same guy had blocked
us from making a turn earlier in the year; and he'd had no way of
knowing whether my children were in the van. It was our family vehicle
that he tried to run off the road. We were helping a former member
leave when this happened. We have consulted with a lawyer, who for
a nominal amount will sue. We did file a complaint with the police
department, but because of the influence that they have nothing
has been done. In effect, we have been denied the privilege of leaving
the church , peacefully.
Freedomofmind.com fully supports religious
freedom and the United Nations Universal Declaration of Human Rights.
The fact that a person’s name or group appears on our website
does not necessarily mean they are a destructive mind control cult.
They appear because we have received inquiries and have established
a file on the group.
The Freedom of Mind Resource Center Inc. was established by cult expert Steve Hassan.